LaRouche: Obama’s Words Are a Threat to Kill

December 27, 2016

By Paul Gallagher and Diane Sare

A grim report published overnight by NBC News holds that outgoing President Barack Obama used the "red phone" in early October, directly to threaten a military attack on Russia over alleged e-mail "hacking" and attempts to influence the American election. Obama's subsequent Dec. 15 interview statement reserving the right to "attack, at a time and place of our choosing," has been followed by the assassination of a diplomat crucial to Russia's effort with Turkey to end the Syria civil war, as well as a bloody rampage by a truck into a Berlin Christmas market which killed 12 and injured dozens. A vacationing Obama has maintained a stony silence on the murder of the Russian ambassador in Ankara. This is both the most blatant of Obama's numerous attempts, over years, to threaten both Russia and China; and the most dangerous. There was a coup attempt in Turkey in July in which, at least, close relatives and former colleagues of this assassin were involved. Also involved—both Russia and Turkey estimate—NATO.

Russian Ambassador Karlov had played a crucial role in not only Russia-Turkey relations, but in the preparation for the Russia-Iran-Turkey talks on the future of Syria now that Aleppo has been liberated. Clearly the assassins’ intention was to split Russia and Turkey apart on their Syria framework agreement. That objective, at the least, has not succeeded; the talks continued as planned. Both Russian and Turkish representatives have stated their understanding that the intent of this assassination was to sabotage precisely this crucial collaboration toward stabilizing Syria.

The leading trans-Atlantic nations and their Gulf allies—all facing economic stagnation and threat of another financial crash—are grotesquely mistaken about China, India, Russia and the new economic paradigm of rapid economic and scientific progress around them. Their arrogant and disassociated leaders, typified by German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Francois Hollande, not to mention the criminally insane U.S. President Barack Obama, cannot even figure out why the Brexit vote occurred or why Hillary Clinton lost the U.S. elections, or why most nations’ leaders on the planet now prefer to orient toward China and Russia.

Thus a pompous Jordanian prince, now U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights (a Human Rights Commission which is chaired by Saudi Arabia!), has demanded that Philippines President Roderigo Duterte be tried for murder for his war on drugs.

It is Obama who should be on trial! For years, every Tuesday, Obama has personally selected many thousands of people to be killed by drones, including as many as 200 people in one strike, as in Somalia last August. His Libya invasion, his arming Saudi Arabia for war on Yemen, his arming of jihadis and ultimately terrorists in Syria, have cost the lives of tens of thousands of people—including one head of state, and one U.S. Ambassador in Libya.

In contrast to President Duterte of the Philippines, who is attempting to eradicate the drug plague imposed upon his people, Obama's own drug policy in the United States has become—due to both inaction and legalization—horribly lethal, with American drug overdose deaths tripling to over 50,000 per year during his presidency.

His actions now, threatening Russia and China directly, portend mass killing.

In response to Obama’s threats of “action” against Russia and President Putin—an escalation unseen during any time of the Cold War—Lyndon LaRouche stated clearly today, “Obama has been a killer as President. Hillary Clinton went along with it, that's a fact. It is also the British. And it is NATO. They will kill as many as they can, to get their way. And to stop them, as President Putin now says, you will have to make them pay.”

And this killing is all to stop a new economic paradigm, initially known as the “BRICS policy,” which seeks to span the continents with new corridors of transport, power, communications, new cities; to return to the scientific frontiers of space exploration and fusion technologies we have abandoned.

Now is not the time to wait on the sidelines and “see what Trump is going to do.” President Obama is determined to sabotage any and all potential for a peaceful and productive future, even before President-Elect Trump takes office. It is time for the American people to stop denying the truth about President Obama’s murderous actions and try him for the crimes he has already committed before he kills again.



The Road of Infinite Progress: Revive a Crash Program for Fusion Power

by Megan Beets

This is article is an introduction to a coming series of weekly articles by the LaRouchePAC Science Research Team regarding the critical role of fusion power, space exploration, and the creative powers of the human mind in shaping the coming establishment of the new international paradigm of relations among great civilizations.

“Our children will enjoy in their homes electrical energy too cheap to meter... It is not too much to expect that our children will know of great periodic regional famines in the world only as matters of history, will travel effortlessly over the seas and under them and through the air with a minimum of danger and at great speeds, and will experience a lifespan far longer than ours, as disease yields and man comes to understand what causes him to age.”
Lewis Strauss, Chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission, 1954

Contrary to the un-natural environmentalist ideology which still underlies the thinking of most in the trans-Atlantic nations today, mankind {must always grow}—both in number, and in the power he exerts in and over nature. This is not a choice; it is our essential species characteristic, not shared by any animal, and it is one the universe depends on for its continuing improvement and development.

Today, the world population is approaching 7.5 billion, and is growing exponentially. Under the “greenie” system—one which sees man as an animal—any increase in resource consumption required to provide a high standard of living to each and every human individual is horrific, an unthinkable “looting” of the planet’s limited riches—a policy which must be stopped at all costs!

This outlook is a scientific fraud, and is part of a dying empire system.

To a healthy civilization, as with the “New Paradigm” intention of China to eliminate poverty worldwide, each of these 7.5 billion persons is, in potential, an indispensable resource for the next creative breakthrough for humanity—a breakthrough which {creates} new resources and potentials.

When U.S. policy was centered on a commitment to progress for all mankind, such as under John F. Kennedy, rather than geopolitics, we had intense crash programs both in space travel/colonization, and in harnessing the incredible potentials of the atomic nucleus in the form of fusion power.

Before those programs were sabotaged and all but shut down, the participating scientists had the natural and optimistic view that humanity was on the verge of overcoming poverty, disease, and energy shortages for good, relegating these problems to a bygone era.

What did those scientists see in the potentials of fusion power and the space program, of which most people today are completely ignorant? What happened (and is happening) in the U.S. fusion program? How might we revive this today?

For that, we must look to the remaining potentials in the U.S., and to the leadership of China.

But first, consider a controversial fact.

Population Growth is Natural, and Good

The truth about mankind, unlike all animals, is that we are willfully creative. This means that we have the capacity to change nature in an increasingly powerful way by applying new discoveries of scientific and cultural principles to our work and life. For this, we are “rewarded” with an increased potential for both population density and lifespan.

For example, the early 20th Century introduction of electricity into processes of industry, transportation, and agriculture revolutionized the quality and quantity of the productive output per capita, far beyond anything possible before. In this respect, man’s power to change the planet—to create new materials and states of matter, higher energy throughput in plants and animals, large-scale construction of infrastructure, etc.—has increased in an exponential way since our very beginning.

The growth in our species’ power does not come about gradually; rather, each introduction of a discovery of a hitherto unknown principle (e.g. electromagnetism) has resulted in great, revolutionary leaps upward in our productive powers of labor per capita—and most importantly in our minds’ increased powers to make the next scientific breakthrough. Therefore, it is in the interest of all mankind that each person—a potential source of the next discovery—enjoys a stable standard of living, and has access to the highest educational and cultural resources possible.

The challenges this poses for an ever-growing and longer-living population can only be overcome if we organize our society around the mission of discovering ever-higher principles of nature, and expanding our dominion off this planet, colonizing other bodies in our Solar system.

For this, we must make the leap to fusion power.

The Optimism of Nuclear Fusion

Nuclear fusion is the joining together of two atomic nuclei—a process which powers the Sun—and it is no easy task to replicate this stellar phenomenon in the conditions on the surface of the Earth. It requires (under one hypothesis) the creation and handling/control of hot gases—plasmas—at temperatures many times hotter than the center of the Sun, which continue to behave in ways that defy our assumptions about the of nature of matter.

But what is so promising about achieving controlled fusion? In quantitative terms, the power density in an atomic nucleus is upwards of a billion times greater than that of the chemical forces contained in molecules. In terms of fuels, each gram of nuclear fusion fuel (deuterium-tritium) is 1,000 times more energy-dense than nuclear fission fuel (uranium-235), and up to one million times more energy dense than chemical fuels (hydrogen-oxygen combustion).

In order to obtain fuel for fusion, we will mine the oceans for the plentiful heavy hydrogen (deuterium) contained in seawater, and later, mine the Moon for the optimal fusion fuel held in the lunar soil, helium-3.

In qualitative terms, with full control over the atomic nucleus—both fission and fusion—humanity establishes a completely new relationship to materials and energies. We will, for example, be able to create new, specialty steels and other metals on a mass scale; manufacture medical isotopes when and wherever needed; mine our landfills for resources with the fusion torch; power a scientific colony and industrial operations on the Moon during the long lunar nights; and power a fusion-driven rocket for a trip of weeks, rather than months, to Mars and planets beyond, extending our reach into the Solar system.

Incredible progress has been made toward the mastery of fusion in the U.S. and internationally, beginning in the 1950s. If the trajectory established in the early decades of the U.S. fusion program continued, then mastery of fusion as a power source would already be providing nations of the world with virtually unlimited energy, and would have created a qualitative transformation in our powers of industry, transportation, and medicine.

While the U.S. budget for fusion has been cut year after year, thus crippling a successful and necessary endeavor, China has today become the only nation in the world which is increasing its fusion budget, and has the intention to graduate 2,000 new fusion scientists by 2020.

In Part II, we will take up the current state of the U.S. fusion program (and its promising recent achievements), as well as the important developments of the past 15 months in Europe and Asia.

Project Phoenix: To Raise Aleppo from the Ashes of War

By Hussein Askary and Ulf Sandmark

On December 17, the Syrian city of Aleppo was finally liberated from the barbaric forces of Obama’s Anglo-Saudi takfiri terrorists. After almost five years of their occupation of the eastern part of the city and the north of the province, this second largest city in Syria and a thriving economic and cultural center of the nation has been reduced to little more than a heap of rubble.

In the 2004 census, the population of the whole Province of Aleppo was 4.4 million, half of which, 2.1 million, lived in the city of Aleppo. The private sector dominates the city's economy, reflecting the population's high degree of entrepreneurship, with the majority working in small and medium industries and commerce. Sixty percent of the workforce was employed in productive enterprises, of which 25 percent worked in manufacturing. Aleppo was the manufacturing powerhouse of Syria, the home to 30-40 percent of national manufacturing. The city's export share was around 35 percent of Syria's total non-oil exports. Moreover, Aleppo dominated both textiles and pharmaceutical industries in the country. The city had a substantial presence in all four subsectors of manufacturing: textiles, chemical, engineering and food-processing sectors.

Modern Industrial Ambitions

The Sheikh Najjar industrial city is located 10 km to the north east of Aleppo’s city boundaries. Its construction was started in the year 2000. The city, with its area of 4,412 hectares, included industry, housing, infrastructure, green areas, commercial services, and administrative areas. In 2009, 413 industrial firms were already operating in the city and an additional 1,129 were under construction. Its industrial area, which had been provided with world standard infrastructure facilities, was divided into three zones: light industry, medium sized industries, and heavy industries.

Fighting inside the industrial city between the rebels and government forces has turned the Sheikh Najjar industrial city to little more than a ghost town. The Sheikh Najjar Industrial City was a very good example of the intentions of the Syrian government to pursue a process of industrialization. This process must be revived under the reconstruction process.

The Sheikh Najjar Industrial city outside of Aleppo, before and after the war. Much of Aleppo has been reduced to rubble over the course of the five years of fighting.

Project Phoenix

Aleppo is the oldest continuously inhabited city in the world. It has existed for more than 10,000 years. Since ancient times, Aleppo has been a hub of world trade between East and West, and its perfect position between the Mediterranean and Mesopotamia made it a major trade center. Throughout its long history, Aleppo has witnessed many moments of greatness and decline, survived massive turmoil, earthquakes both physical and social, and arose again like the bird of the Phoenix. The people and government of Syria have kept the same spirit alive in the face of the worst crisis in the history of the country.

In November 2015, a delegation of the Schiller Institute and the Syrian-Swedish Committee for Democracy traveled to Damascus (including the co-author of this article, Ulf Sandmark) to bring humanitarian aid to the war-torn country, but more importantly, to present to the highest levels of the Syrian government the Schiller Institute’s Project Phoenix for the Reconstruction of Syria.

Syria’s geographical position connects the continents of Asia, Europe and Africa in the World Land-Bridge.

Project Phoenix consisted of three major sections: 1. How to mobilize the physical, intellectual and moral potential of the nation for reconstruction; 2. How to finance reconstruction; and 3. How Syria can benefit from connecting to China’s New Silk Road project.

Certain developments in the past two years prove the Schiller Institute’s intervention to be timely and correct. The intervention of the BRICS nations to change the decaying and destructive world order in 2014 was a major incentive for the Syrian people to follow this new paradigm. However, the direct military intervention by Russia in September 2015 in support of the Syrian Army and people in fighting the terrorists and forces of the dark ages, has set the stage for a completely new political and strategic geometry in that country and the whole region.

Added to the Russian military intervention, on the economic side, Chinese President Xi Jinping’s brought the concept of the New Silk Road to southwest Asia and the Arab world in January 2016 in his visit to Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Iran. Chinese and Russian government officials visited Syria and offered to help in the reconstruction process. The Syrian Investment Agency (SIA) announced in April 2016 that it was intending to organize, soon, a reconstruction conference together with the BRICS nations.

In the meantime, in February 2016, Executive Intelligence Review produced an Arabic version of the special report “The New Silk Road Becomes the World Land-Bridge,” with an added feature on Project Phoenix. In this Arabic version, Helga Zepp-LaRouche, Chairwoman of the Schiller Institute, argued that connecting the Middle East to the New Silk Road project would be a key element of establishing peace and development in this region.

Financing reconstruction in a nation ruined by war?

A Hamiltonian national credit system can kick off the reconstruction process, in spite of the fact that most of the country’s previous physical economy and financial capacities are devastated to a large extent. Examples like the newly founded United States in the late 18th century, or Germany after WWII can serve as good examples of how a nation can mobilize to rebuild itself after a destructive war.

The starting point for a credit system is a vision of reconstruction. This should include a centralized development plan, declaring step by step what the nation intends to accomplish at defined future dates. With this plan as the foundation, the government can issue the necessary credit to put the available workforce, tools, and materials to work. The projects can be run by either private entrepreneurs or government authorities.

For issuing this reconstruction credit, the government needs an institution devoted to rebuilding the nation, such as a National Bank or a special Reconstruction Bank, with the Syrian state holding the majority control over its stocks and policies. Special “Hamiltonian Credit” should be provided by the state, either directly (through the Treasury) or through the central bank, to the Reconstruction Bank. It can also raise additional domestic capital for this bank in a way similar to Egypt’s mobilization of its people to finance the expanded Suez Canal: by stock offerings directly to the citizens of Syria at home or in the diaspora. With this complementary credit mechanism, the government can administer enough credit for the rapid reconstruction of Syria.

When the government has given permission for a project to start, the Reconstruction Bank releases the necessary credit to an account for the project. The authorities, or an entrepreneur who has the government contract for a given reconstruction project, pays his suppliers and workers with the credit from this account. This arrangement continues until the project is finished. All the new credits from the Reconstruction Bank then will have their “security” in the accomplishment of the finished projects.

Furthermore, credits from private banks should be strictly controlled to ensure that they are directed in accordance with the reconstruction plan, i.e. as categories of loans necessary for the physical needs of industries and the people. The expansion of credit is thus tied to the real economy.

A domestic Hamiltonian credit system can enable national labor and resources to be fully employed and utilized, but it cannot pay for what needs to be imported. Usually, for that purpose, foreign currency, primarily from export income, is used. But this will not suffice for the massive reconstruction and development efforts. Syria will need huge loans in foreign currency, to be able to import needed machines and equipment. These loans may be linked to the reconstruction plan and the value of the projects being financed. They can also be part of export-credit agreements with industrialized nations to help import the needed machinery and technology into the country. In this way, the loans and their interest rates can be adapted to the long-term repayment possibilities derived from the project.

The BRICS New Development Bank and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) have been established to provide credit based on the potential of each project into the future, rather than being based only on the current payment capacity of those nations which are initiating the project. Thus, Syria has great potential to obtain financing in foreign currency for important large-scale infrastructure projects. As foreign indebtedness under the new paradigm corresponds to the projects being built, it will be good debt. The more such debt is incurred to increase the potential of the national economy, the better. Such debt will not be a bondage, but a measure of Syria’s investment in its future potential.

Physical-economic development

Reconstruction can be oriented to creating an infrastructure platform with the highest possible level of technology and productivity. A major upgrade of the chemical industry, based on oil and gas resources, can promote new industries producing fertilizers, plastics, pharmaceuticals, and other high-tech products. In line with the BRICS paradigm, the nuclear industry that was destroyed by Israel and by sanctions can be resurrected both for power production and water desalination.

The targeting and destruction of the Syrian pharmaceuticals industry by the enemy underscores its strategic importance, and the same goes for the embattled oil, gas, and petrochemical sectors. Also, the processing of cotton and other agricultural products in Syria's famous textile industry is a major reconstruction task, in addition to building other industries. Temporary work brigades mobilizing the unemployed could be financed in the same way, to build what is needed, while training the unemployed for higher-skill work. The Army Corps of Engineers could provide the kernel of these work brigades, and with such reconstruction projects continue its defense of the Syrian people.

Syria’s national transport routes have to adapt to transcontinental routes from the Mediterranean Sea, the Indian Ocean, the Red Sea, the Caspian Sea, and the Black Sea. This was the vision of President Bashar Assad in his "Five Seas Strategy,” which he pronounced in 2009 before this war was waged on Syria.

The New Silk Road strategy involves not only transportation alone, but international development corridors which will bring long-term vitality and growth to the ancient crossroads of Syria. Besides railways, they include pipelines, water projects, industrial zones, agriculture, and city-building.

Syria and the New Silk Road

Syria enjoys a perfect position between three continents, Asia, Europe and Africa, and also between major water bodies. Thus, it can connect to both the Eurasian-African Land-Bridge and Economic Belt of the New Silk Road, and to the Maritime Silk Road.

The World Land-Bridge, conceived by Lyndon and Helga LaRouche, connecting the continents with development corridors centered on high-speed rail, and creating the basis for mutually beneficial development between all nations.

1. The West/East land route to Baghdad, Teheran and Asia.

The New Silk Road Economic Belt extends from China to Central Asia and Iran, and further to Turkey and Europe. The Iranian transportation plans extend eastward to Iraq, Baghdad, and further along both Tigris and Euphrates rivers to Syria. The branch on the Euphrates River can also be connected to the Maritime Silk Road through the Persian Gulf and the port of Basra in southern Iraq and north-west towards Deir Ezzor, Raqqa and Aleppo. The old Silk Road along the Euphrates River from Basra on the Persian Gulf will reach into Syria, and with a railway connect to Europe through Turkey. Such a Euphrates railway, built in cooperation with Iraq, will be a big step toward regional integration and a development corridor extending from the Persian Gulf, the Arabian Sea and the Indian Ocean to the Eastern Mediterranean and all of Europe.

Another step to open up the old East-West Silk Road routes will be to build a 200-km railway from Deir Ezzor southwest to Palmyra, the legendary Silk Road city. This missing link will allow railway service from Tehran and Baghdad through these Syrian cities and onward, in the same direction, to Damascus and Beirut on the Mediterranean.

2. The north-south link to Egypt and Africa.

A more direct land transport corridor can link Syria to the dynamically developing economy of Egypt through rebuilding the historical north-south transportation route in western Syria, also known as the Hijaz Railway from Turkey, which runs south from Aleppo to Damascus, continuing to Amman, Jordan. Syria’s relationship with Egypt’s planned giant industrial zones along the New Suez Canal will be boosted by the railway link from Cairo to the Gulf of Aqaba, across the northern part of the Sinai Peninsula, and on to Amman Jordan from the west. Moreover, Egypt and Saudi Arabia agreed in April 2016 to build a bridge across the Tiran Strait to the southern part of the Sinai Peninsula and northward across the Suez Canal Zone to Cairo. Syria and the Eastern Mediterranean and Asia will be connected to Africa through this transcontinental land-bridge across the Red Sea.

Lyndon LaRouche’s “Oasis Plan for the Middle East,” first publicized in EIR during the 1970s and revived in 1990 as the First Gulf War loomed, envisaged a north-south development corridor from Turkey to Egypt and Africa, running through Damascus, Syria’s Golan Heights into Israel and the Palestinian territories in the West Bank and Gaza, then to Sinai in Egypt. This was the right basis for a durable peace process, which is currently is almost completely dead.

3.The northern link from Europe, the Black Sea region, and Russia.

The Black Sea region will be connected to Syria through Istanbul and another Turkish port, Samsun on the southern Black Sea coast. Istanbul is also the destination for the new Viking Rail Line from the Lithuanian port of Klaipeda on the Baltic Sea, which will be a trade route from the Baltic Sea region and Sweden, southward to Syria. Russia and the Caucasus will also come closer to Syria and Southwest Asia through this route.

4. The Mediterranean maritime link.

Since the inauguration of Egypt’s New Suez Canal in August 2015, enormous ships can now bring cargo flows from China and India on the Maritime Silk Road to the Mediterranean Sea. Freight shipments and travel to Syria will then be possible via this canal and the Greek and Italian ports, once Syria's own Mediterranean Sea ports of Tartus and Latakia are expanded.


The population centers of Syria have historically evolved around the river systems and trade routes. Syria’s seventeen million people are concentrated in the western part of the country in cities lying along the north-south trade corridors from Aleppo, Homs, Hamah, to Damascus. Another concentration is on the Mediterranean coast and the richly rain-fed agricultural regions of Latakia, Idlib and western Aleppo. The other population concentration is in the east of the country, in the Jazirah region between the Euphrates and Tigris rivers. These are rich irrigated agricultural regions that also enjoy a great concentration of oil and gas resources, and hydropower.

From what is stated above, we can conclude that Syria enjoys all the necessary features for reconstruction: human and natural resources, strategic position and a deep cultural heritage. In an peaceful and development-friendly international environment, Syria can quickly emerge out of the ashes of war.

Helga Zepp-LaRouche, Chairwoman of the Schiller Institute stated the following on December 17: "The tragedy of war is that in its course, horrors occur, especially when it rages on for many years and is in fact a proxy war instigated from the outside, and those horrors produce a never-ending chain of horrors. Therefore, it is all the more urgent now that all neighbors of the region, Russia, China, India, Iran, Egypt, but also Germany, France and Italy put large-scale reconstruction of the entire Middle East on the agenda."

The Liberation of Aleppo should be regarded as a turning point, not only in the history of Syria, but of the region and the world, directing the world towards peace and development.

Watch LaRouchePAC's video on the reconstruction of Syria.