The push for war on the part of the British Empire stems from their recognition that their system of rule—the monetary system—is dead. The intention to launch war has been most blatant since the murder of Ghadaffi under the guise of humanitarian regime change. Subsequent to that hideous act the timeline for transitioning into full-fledged general warfare, via staged conflicts in Syria and Iran, has been contracting and the efforts to stop it have become all the more important.

The arch of present events is shaped by this monetary empire's desperate attempt to force nations like Russia and China into submission over their defense of sovereignty of nations. However, the resistance opposing this war drive, primarily expressed by Russia, as well as key ranking figures in the U.S., has thus far been relatively successful.

Yet, it must be kept in mind that the more successful this resistance is, the more desperate the lunatics behind the drive become; thermonuclear annihilation is a very plausible outcome. The only final solution to end the stranglehold that the Empire has held is to end the Empire once and for all by ridding the planet of it's failed monetary system and returning to the principles of an American Credit system and physical economic development.

Get Involved, Call: 1-800-929-7566

Is the Pentagon's new Air Sea Battle operational concept a plan for war on China? The Pentagon says no, that the tactics embodied in the concept can be used in almost any operational situation against almost any enemy, even against narco-terrorists in Colombia.

According to documents Edward Snowden provided the Guardian, foreign politicians and officials who took part in two G20 summit meetings in London in 2009 had their computers monitors and their phone calls intercepted on the instructions of their British government hosts.

A Report by Hussein Askary

Author Hussein Askary. EIR; Sweden.

The popular Tory Mayor of London penned a long column for the London Telegraph today, featuring a detailed account of the torture and murder of a 15-year old boy by Syrian rebels in Aleppo, for telling a joke to a friend.

If, indeed, Syrian forces have used sarin gas against rebel forces and against civilians, the Internet alone should be full of evidence, in the form of cellphone pictures and youtube videos that chemical weapons experts outside of the government could examine.

In an article dated June 15, the Washington Post reports that President Obama had decided weeks ago but waited until he had a pretext before acting.

There's nothing like having the Devil himself confirm what his critics are saying about him, and Tony Blair has done this, with respect to the conflict in Syria.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has again made clear, in no uncertain terms, the view of Russia that Western arming of the Syrian opposition is a bad idea and against international law, and that a no-fly zone would be even a worse idea. On June 14, Lavrov warned that U.S. military aid to the rebels may lead to a further escalation of the violence during a telephone call with U.S.

In 2002-2003, Tony Blair was the one leading the U.S. by the nose into war in Iraq. On Friday, the government of Prime Minister David Cameron, already accused by a veteran British politician of colluding with Blair to cover up Blair's role in that war, is playing the same role with respect to the Obama Administration.

Two Russian officials responded promptly to the Obama administration's provocative escalation in Syria, by announcing that Russia remains "unconvinced" that the evidence of use of chemical weapons in Syria by the Assad government is valid.