The push for war on the part of the British Empire stems from their recognition that their system of rule—the monetary system—is dead. The intention to launch war has been most blatant since the murder of Ghadaffi under the guise of humanitarian regime change. Subsequent to that hideous act the timeline for transitioning into full-fledged general warfare, via staged conflicts in Syria and Iran, has been contracting and the efforts to stop it have become all the more important.

The arch of present events is shaped by this monetary empire's desperate attempt to force nations like Russia and China into submission over their defense of sovereignty of nations. However, the resistance opposing this war drive, primarily expressed by Russia, as well as key ranking figures in the U.S., has thus far been relatively successful.

Yet, it must be kept in mind that the more successful this resistance is, the more desperate the lunatics behind the drive become; thermonuclear annihilation is a very plausible outcome. The only final solution to end the stranglehold that the Empire has held is to end the Empire once and for all by ridding the planet of it's failed monetary system and returning to the principles of an American Credit system and physical economic development.

Get Involved, Call: 1-800-929-7566

Chatham House—the Royal Institute for International Affairs—released a report on Jan. 10, which proposes how NATO should confront "today's security challenges," that is, those that have emerged since NATO's 2010 Strategic Concept. The six-page paper declares near the outset that "Leaders must show the political will to confront today's security challenges today, not tomorrow. They must convince citizens that they cannot take their security for granted. Even as the scars of the economic crisis and the siren call of populist politicians tempt to turn inwards, governments must reaffirm the value of the Atlantic Alliance. They must also acquire and deploy the necessary resources, even though this will mean making tough choices. Following its withdrawal from Afghanistan, NATO needs to reaffirm its value around the twin objectives of collective defense and common security."

Sergei Markov, a prominent Moscow analyst and former MP, who served as one of President Vladimir Putin's authorized representatives during the 2012 election campaign...

Russian President Vladimir Putin, in answers to questions with reporters in France after his meeting with now-Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, stressed, repeatedly, that before anything else can be done in southeast Ukraine, the military operation against the population must be stopped. "I fully welcome Mr. Poroshenko's position that the bloodshed in eastern Ukraine must cease immediately," he said.

Lyndon LaRouche: This subject brings us to the question of the urgency of the immediate impeachment of the President of the United States. Now, among all the things that are otherwise being described here under this question, the essential thing is known now. It's known internationally: Obama has been conducting war, since the greatest part of his Presidency. This warfare, which already started under his predecessor—not the jerky Bush, but under Cheney, as such. What's happened, is, all the things that have been going on, say, in Northern Africa, in games with the Saudis, in games with terrorists, or Blair's operation in setting up the Iraq war, which was an unlawful war, a violation of everything by the British monarchy, the British Empire. So, the war has been going on, but it's not called a war.

Friday was a real Presidential day for French President François Hollande. After drinking tea in the morning with Queen Elizabeth II, he had dinner with U.S. President Obama, and supper with Russian President Vladimir Putin, who is among some 18 international leaders taking part in D-Day landings commemorations in France.

In discussion Friday of the new Russian-Belorussian military doctrine announced at the May 23 Moscow Security Forum meeting, describing the use of "color revolutions" as a form or warfare against Eurasia (or "this area and Asia," as some speakers said): Lyndon LaRouche said the right response is precisely to treat it as war, precisely as Putin is doin

CSIS's Anthony Cordesman was so struck by the laser-like focus of the Russian and Belarusian military speakers at the May 23 Moscow Security Conference that he posted 52 pages of his raw notes, with power-points, to the CSIS site under the title, "Russia and the Color Revolution: A Russian Military View of a World Destabilized by the U.S. and the West (Key Briefs)."