The push for war on the part of the British Empire stems from their recognition that their system of rule—the monetary system—is dead. The intention to launch war has been most blatant since the murder of Ghadaffi under the guise of humanitarian regime change. Subsequent to that hideous act the timeline for transitioning into full-fledged general warfare, via staged conflicts in Syria and Iran, has been contracting and the efforts to stop it have become all the more important.
The arch of present events is shaped by this monetary empire's desperate attempt to force nations like Russia and China into submission over their defense of sovereignty of nations. However, the resistance opposing this war drive, primarily expressed by Russia, as well as key ranking figures in the U.S., has thus far been relatively successful.
Yet, it must be kept in mind that the more successful this resistance is, the more desperate the lunatics behind the drive become; thermonuclear annihilation is a very plausible outcome. The only final solution to end the stranglehold that the Empire has held is to end the Empire once and for all by ridding the planet of it's failed monetary system and returning to the principles of an American Credit system and physical economic development.
Get Involved, Call: 1-800-929-7566
Syrian Information Minister Omran Ahed al-Zouabi reminded the world, yesterday, during an interview with Russia Today in Damascus, that it was the Syrian government, back in March, that requested a United Nations team to come to the country to investigate allegations that chemical weapons had been used on at least two occasions in Aleppo in mid-March.
Within hours of the April 25 morning release of White House legislative aide Miguel Rodriguez's letter to Congress, averring that there was "evidence of varying degrees of confidence" that the Syrian government had used Sarin gas—a letter which the unbalanced Sen. John McCain and others then waved around to call for U.S.
Senior U.S. intelligence sources contacted in the past 36 hours by EIR have provided the following assessment of the claims that Syria used chemical weapons against rebels:
The release of a letter from the Obama White House, solicited by Senators John McCain and Carl Levin of the Senate Armed Services Committee, has put the United States a huge step further on the course toward launching an illegal war against Syria, on the concocted excuse the Assad regime has used chemical weapons against its people.
In a column occasioned by yesterday's Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing on the constitutional and counterterrorism implications of targetted killings by drones, Washington Post military-affairs columnist Walter Pincus considered the implications of the testimony, "should the United States launch airstrikes against Syrian government radars, antiaircraft sites and air bases ...
The Obama White House undercut Pentagon resistance to a U.S. military intervention in Syria, yesterday, with a letter to Senators Carl Levin (D-Mich.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.) claiming that U.S. intelligence agencies do, after all, have some evidence of use of chemical weapons by the Syrian regime against the armed opposition.
Until Thursday, April 25, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in order to avoid a war, had separated the U.S. Government from wild British, French and Israeli claims that Syria has employed chemical weapons. But no longer.