Brits Fully Mobilized to 'Change the Subject' from Copenhagen to Terrorism

American statesman Lyndon LaRouche characterized the "No subject but terrorism" line in the U.S. media today as a desperate move by the Brits to change the subject—from the Empire's utter defeat at the Copenhagen "climate conference," and in the emergence under China/India leadership of the "Four Powers" principle for a new credit system. This constant moving to shift the focus of strategy among nations, by distractions and "switching the trend," is the continuing modus operandi of the British Empire, LaRouche said, in particular after the empire suffers strategic setbacks at the hands of sovereign nation-state forces.

Following the complete failure of British environmentalist genocide policy at Copenhagen as of Dec. 20, the international media have seemed to shift to "all terrorism, all the time." Today's U.S. Sunday TV talk shows intensified the changed trend: none of them allowed discussion of anything except terrorism, anti-terror intelligence, and Yemen.

"The Brits always change as they go along," LaRouche commented to staff today. "This shifting of apparent trends is not "statistical." It's the British Empire. The movement is controlled by the British Empire. Whatever the apparent trend is, it ain't. The real phenomenon is, 'Switch, switch, change the trend.'"

But, "London and the Saudis are always the enemies." In fact, the terrorists who supposedly retook leadership of Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Gulf, after being released to Yemen from Guantanamo (according to scores of media and talking heads), were in fact released to Saudi Arabia! Three factors are being insistently ignored in the constant "terror" chatter: the blatant role of "Londonistan" in indoctrination, recruiting, and funding of terrorist networks; the Saudi role in the same; and the question, "Why, then, is the U.S. just sending 35,000 more troops to Afghanistan?"

As for the British plan, joined by Obama, to form a special jointly-funded police unit in Yemen; the decision by the British and the U.S. to close their embassies in Yemen—both announced Sunday morning; and the announcement that the United Nations discussion of Afghanistan scheduled for spring, will now take place on January 28 in London, with its agenda at least in part changed to terrorism; LaRouche affirmed, "Obama has no plans. He's a nothing. The British Empire has plans."

This is a reaction to the rout of the British at Copenhagen—the little Queen's chosen vehicle to achieve global fascism. The ubiquitous discussion of terrorism is standard British Empire operating procedure to distract from the infrastructure-credit deals China, Russia, and India have signed. This is intended to distract from the possibility of the United States playing its true role as a cornerstone with those other three nations, in a Four Powers agreement to destroy the British System and rebuild the world.